from corner.NationalReview.com
Saturday, November 28, 2009
What Story?
[Mark Steyn]
Michael Gerson has lousy timing. In The Washington Post, in one of those
now familiar elegies for old media, he writes:
And the whole system is based on a kind of intellectual theft. Internet
aggregators (who link to news they don't produce) and bloggers would have little
to collect or comment upon without the costly enterprise of newsgathering and
investigative reporting. The old-media dinosaurs remain the basis for the entire
media food chain.
That's laughably untrue in the Warmergate story. If you rely on the lavishly
remunerated "climate correspondents" of the big newspapers and networks, you'll
know nothing about the Climate Research Unit scandals - just the
business-as-usual drivel about Boston being underwater by 2011. Indeed, even
when a prominent media warm-monger addresses the issue, the newspaper prefers to
reprint a month-old column predating the scandal. If you follow online analysis
from obscure websites on the fringes of the map, you'll know what's going on. If
you go to the convenience store and buy today's newspaper, you won't. That's the
problem.
If anyone needs newspapers, it ought to be for stories like this. If there were
no impending apocalypse, then "climate science" would be a relatively obscure
field, as it was up to a generation ago. Now it produces celebrity scientists
living high off the hog of billions in grants. They thus have a vested interest
in maintaining the planet's-gonna-fry line. So what do the media do? Instead of
exposing the thesis to rigorous journalistic examination, they stage fluffy
green stunts, run soft-focus "living green" features with Hollywood "activists",
and at a time of massive staff cutbacks in every other department create the
positions of specialist "climate correspondent" and "environmental reporter" and
fill them with sycophantic promoters of the Big Scare to the point that, as Dr
Mann coos approvingly to The New York Times, "you've taken the words out of my
mouth".
What Gerson writes ought to be true. Warmergate demonstrates why it isn't.
* * * * *
Seems like we once had inquisitive newspapermen and daring reporters in this country. People who believed in "You shall know the truth; and the truth shall set you free". Somewhere along the line they all became investigative journalists and anchor persons and media stars. Now, just like our president, someone else writes their words for them, and their noses are brown.