08/25/10 UPDATED 08/28/10 scroll down
Posted by:Sebastian on Aug 25th, 2010 at Snowflakes in Hell
EPA Considering Banning Lead Ammunition
| NSSF is springing into action, as the public comment period
opens on EPA considering a regulation that will ban all traditional
lead ammunition. This would basically end the shooting sports as we
know it. Remember this is a no-win situation for us, because bullets
made of materials other than lead are often considered armor
piercing by law. Copper is your basic material, and copper is
expensive, and has much poorer performance properties than lead. Read the rest of the post... and the comments.
* * * * * I have over 10,000 rounds stashed away. It's going to take me a long time to turn that all in to the government. You can tell these maggots learned a lot in law school: don't ban the guns, ban the bullets. That's freaking brilliant. I'd like to meet the guy who came up with that idea, and rip his lungs out.
|
08/28/10 UPDATE
At USNews
EPA Surrenders to NRA on Gun Control Issue
EPA rejects attempt to regulate lead in bullets after NRA
protests
| In a swift and unexpected decision, the Environmental Protection
Agency today rejected a petition from environmental groups to ban
the use of lead in bullets and shotgun shells, claiming it doesn't
have jurisdiction to weigh on the controversial Second Amendment
issue. The decision came just hours after the Drudge Report posted
stories from Washington Whispers and the Weekly Standard about how
gun groups were fighting the lead bullet ban. The EPA had planned to solicit public responses to the petition for two months, but this afternoon issued a statement rejecting a 100-page request from the Center for Biological Diversity, the American Bird Conservancy, and three other groups for a ban on lead bullets, shot, and fishing sinkers. The agency is still considering what to do about sinkers. * * * * * Reminded me a lot of the "Cuban Missile
Crisis" in October 1962. One would think that in an organization the size of our federal government, they could put together at least one team of smart people to review shit that's about to be thrown over the fence to the citizens. In the corporate world we called this a "red team". Their job was to tear into the document or manual looking for any way it could be mis-interpreted, confusing, offensive, etc. More than once it saved expensive mistakes, ill-will and embarrassment. If our Constitution had a provision for a recall vote or a "no-confidence" vote, Washington D.C. would be a ghost-town tomorrow.
Safe your weapons and stand down, but stay alert.
|