| A federal law is needed to cover threats
against free-speech rights. Across media and geographies, Islamic
extremists are increasingly using intimidation to stifle free
expression. By Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Daniel Huff
Earlier this year, after Comedy Central altered an episode of
"South Park" that had prompted threats because of the way it
depicted Islam's prophet Muhammad, Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris
proposed an "Everybody Draw Muhammad Day." The idea was, as she put
it, to stand up for the 1st Amendment and "water down the pool of
targets" for extremists.
The proposal got Norris targeted for assassination by radical Yemeni
American cleric Anwar Awlaki, who has been linked to the attempted
Christmas Day bombing of a Northwest Airlines flight and also to
several of the 9/11 hijackers. This month, after warnings from the
FBI, Norris went into hiding. The Seattle Weekly said that Norris
was "moving, changing her name, and essentially wiping away her
identity."
It's time for free-speech advocates to take a page from the abortion
rights movement's playbook. In the 1990s, abortion providers faced
the same sort of intimidation tactics and did not succumb. Instead,
they lobbied for a federal law making it a crime to threaten people
exercising reproductive rights and permitting victims to sue for
damages. The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, or FACE,
passed in 1994 by solid bipartisan margins. A similar act is needed
to cover threats against free-speech rights.
Article continues...
* * * * *
This sounds good to me, except for the part about allowing the
victim to sue. (They may as well phrase it "the victim or
his survivors to sue".) I'd rather not win any victories
posthumously.
I much prefer a proactive philosophy that I read on the web last
year: "Be polite, be courteous, but have a plan to kill everyone you
meet."
Teddy Roosevelt would have liked that, I think.

|