ARMY CHIEF-OF-STAFF: “LOSS OF DIVERSITY AT FORT HOOD WOULD
BE GREATER TRAGEDY THAN LOSS OF LIFE”
Posted by thelastcrusade - November 11th, 2009

Defends Muslims Madness
General George Casey, the highest ranking officer in the U.S. Army, said that
the deaths of 12 soldiers and one civilian at Foot Hood would become a far
greater tragedy “if our diversity becomes a casualty.”
Appearing on “Meet the Press,” General Casey warned the media that “it is way
too soon to draw conclusions” concerning the motive of Major Nidal Malik Hasan.
He upheld the strategy of keeping Muslims – - even radical Muslims – - in key
military positions by saying: “Our diversity is our strength.”
“We have to be broad enough to bring in people from all walks of life,” the
General said.
The Army’s Chief-of-Staff asserted: As horrific as this tragedy was, if our
diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.”
General Casey further said that the army hadn’t “missed anything” in regard to
the in-your-face warning signs exhibited by Major Hasan that he was a fanatical
Muslim jihadist and an imminent threat to massacre U.S. troops.
WTF? If Casey had been around for World War II, we would have had Nazi SS officers leading our troops at Normandy.
* * * * *
from Ace of Spades
November 10, 2009
Time Magazine Successfully Notices, Identifies Elephant in the
Room
I'm so proud of Time. Next we can move on shapes and colors! Like Big Boys
and Growing Girls!
Golly Gee Willickers -- do you think maybe it's possible that Hasan's obvious
terrorist sympathies were overlooked because he's a Muslim and there are special
rules protecting Muslims? And that you could get your career ended in a hurry
for asking the sort of questions you'd ask of any non-Muslim?
As everyone here keeps saying: If a white Christian reader of this blog was in
the military and began writing letters to White Supremacist groups and openly
stating his first loyalty was to "his race" with his country and constitution
placing a distant second and third, it seems rather likely that investigations,
and dishonorable discharges, would ensue.
So why not this guy?
Because the Muslim lobby screams bloody murder and goes on lawsuit jihads
whenever a correligionist gets so much as three seconds of Stink Eye from
anyone.
And this is killing people. People are being murdered due to hurt feelings being
elevated above human life.
As it was long contended it would.
Army officials strongly deny any suggestion that Hasan's religion resulted in
his being given special treatment. But one officer who attended the Pentagon's
medical school with Hasan disagrees. "He was very vocal about being a Muslim
first and holding Sharia law above the Constitution," this officer recalled.
When fellow students asked, "How can you be an officer and hold to the
Constitution?," the officer said, Hasan would "get visibly upset — sweaty and
nervous — and had no good answers." This medical doctor would only speak
anonymously because his commanders have ordered him not to talk about Hasan, he
said.
This officer said he was so surprised when Hasan gave a talk about "the war on
terror being a war on Islam" that he asked the lieutenant colonel running the
course what Hasan's presentation had to do with health care. "I raised my hand
and asked, `Why are you letting this go on — this has nothing to do with
environmental health.' The course director said, `I'm just going to let him
go.'" The topic of Hasan's presentation, the officer says, had been approved in
advance by the lieutenant colonel.
The officer says he and another colleague complained to staff at the Uniformed
University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland, but got nowhere. "It
was a systemic problem — the same thing was happening at Walter Reed," the Army
Medical Center several miles away, where Hasan was working as a psychiatrist.
(The Washington Post reported Tuesday that Hasan gave a similar presentation at
Walter Reed in which he said Muslims should be released as conscientious
objectors rather than being force into combat against fellow Muslims.) But
"political correctness" inside the military, the officer asserts, insulated
Hasan. "People are afraid to come forward and challenge somebody's ideology," he
says, "because they're afraid of getting an equal-opportunity complaint that can
end careers."
A retired four-star officer says that, based on the evidence gleaned so far, it
was Hasan's career that should have been cut short. "They could have given — him
a dishonorable discharge and said what he's doing works against good order and
discipline," said the general, who also requested anonymity. But rather than any
preferential treatment given to Hasan because of his religion, "My guess is he
fell through the cracks," the general said.
And my guess that is General McCaffrey speaking, who emailed Michael Yon making
the same basic point.
This investigation will go nowhere, because no one will ever admit they
refrained from acting out of fear they would be punished and their careers
terminated for doing so. In other words, the government has created a perfectly
self-sustaining system of willful ignorance: They will cashier people who lodge
complaints about people about to "Go Muslim," but, on the other hand, those
people, having failed to take the necessary steps to protect human life, in
order to protect their careers, will never have the guts to admit they did so,
and will blame their inaction on other factors.
Which is just what the government wants: It wants these things swept under the
carpet and deliberately overlooked, and it furthermore wants its very policy of
sweeping these things under the carpet and deliberately overlooking them to
itself be swept under the carpet and deliberately overlooked.
That's the way it perpetuates this scandalous indifference to security and human
life: It has created such a perverse system of rewards and penalties that no one
can publicly admit to being so monstrous and callous as to act according to that
system of rewards and penalties. A system so corrupt that no one can admit to
acquiescing to it.
Who can possibly come forward and declare: "Yes, I chose to allow a risk of
human life to proceed undisturbed because I valued my own career more than life
or my country's security"? No one can say that. The government has a system of
penalties for whistle-blowers, but those dissuaded from whistle-blowing can
never admit to being cowardly enough to have refrained from action due to
government threat.
The system will remain in place, because no one dares admit the very existence
of The System at all. The System requires denial of The System. In fact, that's
rule one of The System.
And so we see here, everyone who could have acted to stop Hasan's murderous
rampage quickly ascribes their behavior to any other motive -- well, we just
need mental health professionals in the Army; even -- dare I say especially? --
mental health professionals who are themselves dangerous lunatics, because hey,
personal experience and all -- rather than admitting to following the covert,
cowardly policy the government actually favors and enforces. Secretly.
posted by Ace at 03:27 PM