Home Up

07/14/10

At American Thinker


Not Again! Obama v. Petraeus

Well, that didn't last long, did it?

 

Anthony Kang

Straight off the heels of the McChrystal-debacle, further conflict between the Obama administration and military officials appears to loom on the horizon - involving none other than newly appointed Commander of US Forces in Afghanistan, General David H. Petraeus.

Of the countless characteristics which define liberals, Democrats, and refusal to accept reality and to call a spade a spade.

(I had a friend once who prided himself on always calling a spade a spade until one day he tripped over one, fell down, was injured and called it a F**KING SHOVEL.)

The Washington Times' Rowan Scarborough foresees just one tiny problem with the administration's official policy however:

John O. Brennan, President Obama's chief national security adviser for counterterrorism, delivered a major policy address on defining the enemy. He laid out the White House policy of detaching any reference to Islam when referring to terrorists, be it al Qaeda, the Taliban or any other group.
*
*
*
The Petraeus doctrine refers to "Islamic insurgents," "Islamic extremists" and "Islamic subversives." It details ties between Muslim support groups and terrorists. His co-author was Gen. James F. Amos, whom Mr. Obama has picked as the next Marine Corps commandant and Joint Chiefs of Staff member.
*
*
*

Read the whole article here.


How would a liberal explain World War II in Europe without using any reference to Nazism? I bet they can but you know it would be a crock of shit.