
March 18, 2009
The Knock on the Door
By Lona Manning
A sitting President of the United States is "organizing a political organization
loyal to him, bound by a pledge, outside the government and existing party
apparatus. The historical precedents are ominous."
What is so ominous about an organization? Americans, Alexis de Tocqueville
famously observed, "constantly form associations.... If it is proposed to
inculcate some truth or to foster some feeling by the encouragement of a great
example, they form a society."
Certainly, thousands of organizations seek to influence the political debate.
There's Newt Gingrich's American Solutions or the left-wing People for the
American Way, for instance.
Political parties are another example of an association, of course. Before,
during and after political campaigns, the Democrats and Republicans promote
their agendas. As legal entities, they have their own constitutions, their rules
of business, their chairmen and officers. They have to be accountable to both
the government and their members.
But there is a new organization on the political scene -- "Organizing for
America," announced by President Barack Obama in late January but officially
unfurled last weekend.
Obama describes OFA as a "grass-roots movement" but OFA is a "project" of the
Democratic National Committee.
As Politico reported, OFA will take the 10 million person database built up by
the Obama campaign "to mobilize support for the president's legislative agenda."
A visit to the OFA website reveals that supporters are not simply asked to sign
up, they are asked to take a pledge. A pledge to support -- not the flag, not
the constitution, not the country, not even the Democratic party, but Obama and
his "bold plan." OFA does not use the Democratic Party logo but the "O"-shaped
logo of the Obama campaign in which the red white and blue of the flag are
abstracted to soft pastel colors.
(Celebrities like Ashton Kuchner and Demi Moore did not wait until the official
launch to "pledge to be of service" to Barack Obama, of course.)
You will not find any mention of OFA`s governing structure, their budget, their
bylaws, or their officers at the OFA website. Donations to the website go to the
DNC, but OFA is managed out of the White House. If you click on the comments
button, you are taken to a link to the White House email.
Those who take the pledge are asked to "talk with people about the President's
plan" and to "ask them to sign their names to the pledge" in support of Obama's
policies.
So we have a Movement -- this is their term, not mine -- organized by, and loyal
to, a sitting President. Pledge canvassers, armed with your name, will ask you
to pledge loyalty to the President too. A president whose term has already
become a permanent campaign, is signing up ground forces in a mass organization
pledged to personal loyalty to their Leader.
Does anyone know of any historical precedents for this in the United States?
Did Mitch Stewart, youthful director of OFA, who asks Obama's acolytes to
organize "neighborhood by neighborhood" study anything at school about Mao's
"Red Guards?
How about Fidel Castro's "widespread system of neighborhood informers"?
Or Hugo Chavez's use of "neighborhood committees"?
Did Stewart learn anything about democracy at all?
Do any of Obama's pledged servants understand why a sitting president has no
business creating and deploying his own supporters to help organize their
neighbors?
Keep in mind that these acolytes have renounced any thought of questioning the
actual policies of the maximum leader. Whatever he says, they are for it. They
have given their word.
And they are coming to have a talk with you.
As Thomas Lifson wrote, "This is not the way a democracy is supposed to
operate."
Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/the_knock_on_the_door.html
at March 18, 2009 - 10:55:24 AM EDT

I look forward to chatting with my OFA member.