| By Paul Joseph Watson The Senate is attempting to sneak
through the infamous Internet kill switch cybersecurity bill by
attaching it to another piece of legislation that is almost
guaranteed to pass – the defense authorization bill – in an
underhanded ploy to avoid the difficult task of passing
cybersecurity on its own.
“It’s hard to get a measure like cybersecurity legislation passed on
its own,” Democratic Senator Thomas Carper, who is co-chair of a
Senate subcommittee with cybersecurity oversight, told Government
Information Security.
That’s why lawmakers pushing cybersecurity have resolved to
introduce the legislation as a “rider” to a Senate defense bill that
is likely to be easily passed before the midterm elections.
Senators are still working to merge two different versions of the
cybersecurity bill, one sponsored by Senator Joe Lieberman and
another sponsored by Democrat Jay Rockefeller, into a single omnibus
package, in preparation for a final vote when the Senate returns to
session in mid-September.
“We’re very close to where we need to be in developing a joint
proposal,” said Carper.
Lawmakers are in a race to pass cybersecurity before the midterms
because if they wait until Congress returns after the November 2nd
vote, the chances of getting the bill through “would significantly
dim should the Republicans pick up a significant number of seats”.
That leaves a four week window from the middle of September to the
start of election campaigning for Senators to sneak through the
legislation.
Lieberman’s version of the cybersecurity bill includes language that
would hand President Obama the power to shut down parts of the world
wide web for at least four months with no congressional oversight in
the event of a cyber attack on critical infrastructure systems in
the U.S.
Senators argue that they will be able to attach the Internet kill
switch bill to the Defense Authorization Act because cybersecurity
is a component of national security. However, the primary
justifications behind treating “cybersecurity” as a national
security matter are completely overblown and erroneous.
Proponents of cybersecurity have constantly argued that
government needs to have more power over the Internet because
cyber-terrorists could hack in and dismantle the entire U.S. power
grid, large industrial plants, and the national water supply. This
is a complete misnomer because, as a recent Wired News article
highlighted, power grid and drinking water systems, “Are rarely
connected directly to the public internet. And that makes gaining
access to grid-controlling networks a challenge for all but the most
dedicated, motivated and skilled — nation-states, in other words.”
As we documented in our piece on the issue, the threat from
cyber-terrorists to the U.S. power grid or water supply is minimal.
The perpetrators of an attack on such infrastructure would have to
have direct physical access to the systems that operate these plants
to cause any damage. Any perceived threat from the public Internet
to these systems is therefore completely contrived and strips bare
the real agenda behind cybersecurity – to enable the government to
regulate free speech on the Internet.
This was revealed when Senator Lieberman told CNN’s Candy Crowley
that the real motivation behind cybersecurity was to mimic the
Communist Chinese system of Internet policing.
“Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its
Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” said
Lieberman.
As we have documented, the Communist Chinese government does not
disconnect parts of the Internet because of genuine security
concerns, it habitually does so only to oppress and silence victims
of government abuse and atrocities, and to strangle dissent against
the state.
The decision to try and sneak through the Internet kill switch bill
as part of another package of legislation is undoubtedly a reaction
to increasing awareness about how the terms of the bill would
completely undermine the foundations of the Internet as an outlet of
truly unregulated free speech.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison
Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also
an occasional host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been
interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity
Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night
talk show.
|